Blog Archives

Volume Six, Chapter Four: “Undecided” Voters and the 2016 Election- Random Thoughts


You can have ’em. Neither got my ballot, but I don’t mind betting on the underdog…


I’m making this last post before the 2016 Election a Random Thoughts edition. I’m SO over it, and have a ton of stuff going on personally. I’ll cover that in the year-end post.

I have never, ever longed for an election to be done as I have with this one. It’s the most desperate, negative, and outright contrived campaign season I’ve ever seen.

The GOP candidate is absolutely right that this election is rigged. And his ascendancy to main super-villain is the clearest example of that.

The DNC candidate had to have said super-villain as an antagonist, but SHE’S her own toughest opponent.

The last 16 months have had an obvious story line in play. The woman is supposed to slay the evil man-dragon. What if America breaks character, and the dragon wins?

The DNC has their woman, and the GOP has their loose-cannon pop culture star. Together, they’ve been in the public eye for over 60 years, and have the baggage to prove it.

Are the days of slowly building candidates into national winners over? It worked as recently as eight years ago.

Are people all over the Internet praising their candidates because they actually like them, or because they want to drag others down with them as they make bad choices?

And why is it that most of the defense of one candidate consists of tearing down the other?

Are “undecided” voters actually such, or are they, as is so often the case this time, just too ashamed to admit who they like?

And finally… Who’s going to be the next great bad guy in 2020? Mike Rowe? Caitlyn Jenner? Jake from State Farm?

Well… go on and vote. Enjoy. And by the way, we all know the narrative demands the woman win, but just for the hell of it, I’m putting money on the orangeman. Any takers?


Volume Three, Chapter Nine: A Post-GOP America?

The United States face a guaranteed U.S. economic collapse. Sure, a reduction in government spending and citizens tightening their own damned belts could avoid it. But people aren’t going to volunteer to do it. So, bring on the wrecking ball. In the end, America could be a Democrat dystopia.

American progressives really don’t want to rule the world. As long as they can remain slum lords here in America, they’ll gladly cede the task of handling the lowly masses over to China (not the Arabs; those people are too, well…).  Their voters, used to and enjoying having their lives dictated by others as long as they can engage whatever impulse hits them, will go right along as well.

The current Republican Party is made up of older people getting what they can while they can, and getting gone. The Tea Party shills in 2014 were Christian Coalition groupies in 1994. They joyfully voted in the Establishment GOP they loathe and deny any connection to now. If they truly believed in “LESS GOVERNMENT!”, they would have tried to remove federal involvement in marriage, thus avoiding the battle that hurt them the most.

Neither conservative faction has a younger voting base. They seem to be reverting to middle-aged teenagers as well, with epic rants and no youth outreach. But unlike progressives, they have no one to continue their battle, such as it is. And so, after years of warnings to it, the entire GOP will indeed fall with the U. S. dollar. This will see the U.S. hit rock bottom… the ONLY place the nation can build from.

The collapse of the dollar will probably happen in our lifetime. What happens afterward may play out for decades afterward. But by the time the dust settles, should America somehow avoid other nations chopping it up, all the pressing social issues will be done with. After all, it will be a matter of survival. But America won’t have a World War to boost its economy. It will require the will to make it collectively.

That means rhetorical flame throwers sitting on their money, talking revolution and never actually fighting one, will finally be jettisoned. There will be no room nor need for them. The tribalism will be gone, too; you can’t argue and beg over money and sympathy that isn’t there to be had. If America’s going to make it, yes, it may be socially liberal, but it will have to be fiscally conservative.

That means folks can do what they do, but only on their own dime… if they have a dime. That means there won’t be time made for phony outrage over things one’s probably had people doing around them all along. And above all else, the things most people think matter will be revealed as the nothings they are. Germany and Japan had to start all over after World War II; inevitably, so will America.

Volume Two, Chapter Three: Ivy Leaguers Talking in Tongues

It was Mother’s Day, 2001. I was working for Eckard (now Rite-Aid) Drug Stores on their  regional remodeling team. We had been in Dallas for about a month at that point. I had been out all Saturday night, but a coworker decided she just had to go to church. Joanie Allen-Brooks, a retired Air Force SSGT had nobody to go to church with her. It was Mother’s Day, and she was a mother, so I decided to play “son” and go. She chose the Potter’s House as the place of worship. We had to get there an hour early just to get parking on a regular Sunday. Since it was Mother’s Day, it meant getting there two hours early.

Midway through the service, after a quiet period and offering (you ever notice how most megachurches always take up the offering before the sermon? Just saying…), the band broke out in the mandatory praise break. This is when the band just breaks out with a roaring tune, and all the Holy Ghost commotion starts. Joanie and some girl got the doing their thing in the aisle and tried to get me out there. Then this blonde guy came flying down the aisle, and joined in on the action. Twenty minutes later, the music stopped. Then came Bishop T.D. Jakes himself.

I can’t remember what he said verbatim, but I do know it was about the labor pains we all go through to produce something beautiful. With his forceful command to “PUSH! PUSH! PUSH!” the buck dancing and tongue talking cranked up again. Then, Jakes wrapped it up with a benediction, and it was soon all over. We went back to the parking lot, looked for the car for 30 minutes, finally found it, and left.

Ivy League people often frown on holy hootenannies like Jakes, Jimmy Swaggart and Peter Popoff, and view those who engage in such theatrics as trashy and ignorant. Yet they themselves have been emoting all over the place in honor of their new god as well. And to them, it’s the only game in town.

The worship of President Obama is a religious movement second only to the work of Dr. Billy Graham. “Obamaism” has White folks going to “CHUCH!”, showing up two hours early just to see him, throwing money at his feet, buck dancing, and, ironically, has Ivy Leaguers talking in tongues.


Oh, yes, friends. Obamaism allows people to say incoherent things, and blast those who call it nonsense. It’s not quoting some Mid-East mantra or that… whatever it is that’s spoken in Pentecostal churches. It’s usually in English or Spanish. The words are familiar, everyday words, yet they’re often combined with others into phrases  that the speaker will insist are only clear to the “enlightened”/agreeing hearer, much like Hebrew prayers or Latin in a cathedral.

Take the term “Marriage Equality“. This denotes that lesbian and gay male couples should have the same “rights”, i.e. tax breaks and legal recognition, of heterosexual couples. That in and of itself seems pretty innocuous. However, even with all the “rights” in the world, all marriages aren’t equal. Any one of former House Speaker Newton Leroy Gingrich’s three marriages is NOT equal to Dr. Billy and Ruth Graham’s single, 64-year marriage that only ended with Ruth’s passing in 2007. In legal terms, sure. But if all it takes is a nationally recognized wedding certificate to put a couple on par with Newt or the Grahams, that’s uplifting the former, and diminishing the latter. And “right to marry” doesn’t count either, because anybody has the “right” to the government goodies when they marry the opposite gender. But hey, it only has to sound good…

Then there’s “Right to Choose“, or “Pro-Choice“. This describes women’s desire to have access to birth control and abortions. Women, like most sentient beings, have the right to choose pretty much everything, from clothes to where they live. They can even choose to have sex, which increases the chance of getting pregnant. Women have the right to terminate a pregnancy if they choose or prevent one via contraception. Somehow, this translates into complete strangers paying for her safeguards from pregnancy while she’s having sex. If I walked up to you on the street one day and asked you to buy me a box of condoms, would you do it? On top of that, gay guys actually scream loudest for this “right” for women…  then demand permission to adopt a child.

Immigration Reform” basically defines the process of  lowering (or raising, depending on who you ask) the requirements for U.S. citizenship for those that are here both legally and illegally. To the race hustlers and President Obama, this somehow translates to not only open borders, but free education and employment affirmative action to the children of illegals. That’s what they basically got in July, with one million illegals getting work visas, and twenty-three million legal citizens still out of work. It was great for the Obamaites, who often pay illegals under the table. It was hurtful to those unskilled or newly adult workers, who were knocked out of the job market.

Obamaites can turn on MSNBC get their praise on. They can go on pretty much any website, make proselytes, and scourge infidels. Go downtown, and you’re bound to see someone with an Obama vestry on. (You’ll see the occasional PaulBot or Romneyizer, but they’ll come and go with little fanfare.) But be it 2013 or 2017, Barack Hussein Obama will give that final benediction. The Long-Legged Mack Daddy will walk that aisle, as Ric Flair says, for the last time as the 44th President of the United States of America.  The Obamaites will have to find ways to spend their days. It won’t be easy. When the cost of ObamaCare comes due, tax hikes hit the “middle-class” starting in 2013, and foreigners get a job sooner than a person born here can, all the various groups the Democratic Party will turn on each other.

Volume Two, Number Two: The Two Phrases That Excuse Everything

For the last four or five years, the United States have had a very unstable economy. It’s partly the culmination of a century of government expansion that’s treated the United States Constitution as a malleable “living document”. Countless laws and legislation have expanded governmental scope… and costs. All these activities, however, are only a symptom of the problem. The problem lies in the one place no American wants to admit. That fact keeps them dependent on politicians who will shield them from the truth. You see, the problem is NOT ultimately in Washington, D.C. The problem lies in those who send people to Washington to enact policies. And who does that?

The American voters.

Elected officials represent the will of the voting public. But people love to bitch when the negative consequences to their will surfaces. They want a “safety net” to catch them when they fall. And so long as they can quote Jesus from Matthew 7:1 (Judge not, lest ye be judged) when their lusts come back to haunt them, or quote rapper Silkk the Shocka’s 1999 hit, “It Ain’t My Fault”, it’ll all work itself out. Only when somebody is out to pull some slick sh*t would the words of Jesus and a No Limit Soldier be used interchangeably.

On Tuesday, November 4th, 2008,  Americans elected Barack Hussein Obama as the 44th President of the United States of America. The hope for many was that maybe, just maybe, the Black community would reignite the upward mobility that it saw under Bill Clinton, the original “first Black President”. They’d finally stop screaming “RACISM!”, and the self-destruction would at least subside a little. Four years later, Black unemployment is 14.3%, twice the national average. And a soldier in Afghanistan is safer than a young Black male in inner cities like Chicago’s South Side. But over and over again, it’s cried out: “We shouldn’t judge the less fortunate. You know how we do. We gotta keep it real.”

The Hindus and Asians that sell Black folks Newports and lottery tickets always start out “less fortunate”, but when’s the last time you heard of  Hindu gang banging? Do you see any Asian “baby’s mammas”. They usually get into college through their parents or grades, not affirmative action. Black people are holding “hoodie marches” for a Black teen killed by a “White Hispanic”, yet are quick to justify Blacks shooting each other. (BTW, do you know anybody anywhere who used “White Hispanic” prior to 2012?)  The election of the biracial Barrack Hussein Obama, who was raised as far away from the “Black experience” as one can get, is the most damning indictment on the whole “Afrocentric” mentality.

If you get through one comment thread on an LGBT website without the mention of the religious right or Republicans, you’ve hit paydirt. Yet many gay people see through the facade, and know where the bulk of fault lies.When it comes to light, here we go: “We’re born this way.” “There’s more AIDS cases in Africa than in America.”

Behavior (the content of one’s character, as Dr. King would say) is actually the best way to judge people. Liberal males often laugh behind the activists’ back after his emotional Harvey Milk speech. They know that there’s a high percentage of  “hate crimes” that are faked, or instigated by the “victim’s” harassment. Most legislators who pass  favorable LGBTetc. laws pull their children out of the public schools, away from the PC nonsense championed by the sick Dan Savages of the world. And what could the impoverished Africans and the preppy White boy on Grindr have in common? Indiscriminate sexual behavior. A while back, I knew of a guy who was spreading HIV and not disclosing his status, which is actually a punishable crime. I actually got cussed out for saying something to him. Nonjudgmental-ism and ZERO accountability in the LGBTetc. community can, does, and will continue to kill.

Congressman Barney Frank suggested that banks lower their credit standards for home buyers to prevent “redlining”, the real estate practice of over pricing a house to prevent unwanted buyers (i.e. minorities) from residing in certain neighborhoods. Those same people who bought the houses in the 90’s were losing them barely a decade later. In 2008, just months before leaving the White House, President George W. Bush pushed to save the banks that made the bad housing deals from financial ruin. When Obama took over the reins, he gave people just what they wanted: nonjudgmental buck-passing. “You had the right to enjoy your home. These banks had no right to put you in this mess. We’ll get you out of this.”

If we’re being brutally honest here, many of these buyers simply were not in a position to buy houses. The issue was usually their credit history, not racism. Bankers had to do some crazy number-crunching to qualify these high-risk people for a big loan. When you buy a house outside your means just to keep up with the Jonses, only to find out the Jonses are broke, too, sh*t happens. And for people to expect the President of the United States to protect them from their own ignorant, selfish decisions (and for him to actually DO IT) is outrageous. Yet it happens all the time.

Black leaders like Maxine Waters live it up while her constituents gun each other down. The gay rights movement is actually founded on the greatest self-inflicted plague of the last 70 years, and yet activists will let their people get literally d*cked to death. And people living far beyond their means have now had their chickens come home to roost. Yet those who have used government to come in and fix up their personal f*ck ups have brought EVERYBODY down with them. So the issue in this campaign is not actually Barack Obama or Willard Romney. They can only do what he’s allowed to do. “Judge not” and tell people “it ain’t their fault”, then leave innocents to suffer for things they never did.

Volume II, Chapter One: The New Avengers?

Perhaps as a nod to all these superhero movies coming out over the last few years, we’ve seen the rise of a group of people who seem to want to portray themselves as real-life New Avengers. They believe themselves to have super-strength or even a super-intellect. On the surface anyhow, it seems they are motivated by the desire to help their fellow man. Once you begin to familiarize yourself with these new guardians, however, you realize their antics are motivated by anything but humility and compassion; it’s usually the opposite. Many of these “heroes” go out of their way to convince others that they have no real personal weaknesses, that any flaws in their personae (which is their primary superpower) are conjured up by some enemy force. When you get down to brass tacks, these heroes are often more dangerous than the alleged villains they claim to defend the downtrodden from. Rather than empathy, those in the realm of “Occupying” “social justice”, and “equality” movements usually operate on one word…


Those who “Occupy” have the evil bankers and politicians as an eternal archenemy. Thing is, they’re not the disenfranchised Vietnam veteran panhandling in New York City they like to make their mascot; they’re mostly middle-class, college educated, White boys living off their parents, who oftentimes work in the very establishments they’re “occupying” against. Being spoiled, they can’t imagine that even with a silver spoon in their mouths, they, like their parents, will have to bust their asses to not only make money, but also maintain it.  And their egos can’t take the heat lashed out at their parents for being successful. The “Occupy” movement, at best, is simply the rich masquerading as the proletariat.

Those who engage in “class warfare” can take comfort in looking down on and exploiting the poor for their own gain. The thing that f*cks with them is knowing somebody can look down on them. Since the middle-class can’t have better than the rich (not that they don’t try; remember the housing crisis), they take on the class warfare mantra to present themselves as being better. The front line in class warfare is commonly called “social justice”. All these whale-savers, tree huggers, distributors of other people’s wealth, and fetus dumpers are not doing all this out of some endless fountain of compassion or liberality. They may want to be in Fortune magazine, but know they’ll have to settle for the local newspaper’s life section. One thing I’ve noticed about these social justices: it may be lonely at the top, but it must be crowded as hell in the middle. I say that because yeah, they’ll get some inner-city Black kid under the Big Brothers/Big Sisters program and take him to the mall and all that, but they never take the time to really instill in that child the values that got them where they are. These social justices, like the “Occupiers”, condemn the Koch brothers, but think about it, especially if you live in the Chattanooga, TN, area: who’s put a bigger dent in poverty, the Koch Brothers, who own a food processing plant here and hire often, or the local social justice orator? In one sentence, here is the definition of class warfare: the well-off  invoking the plight of bad-off (in particular minorities) to attack the better-off.

Then there’s the battle for gay “equality”. It’s actually ran more often than not on something besides envy: moral relativism. They (those who live their lives morally relative) make the rules as they go, and they change depending on what works best for them. ALL LGBTetc. people must conform to these very fluid standards; consciences are not allowed. While their neighbors may watch Rachel Maddow or Anderson Cooper on TV, they also know how morally relative Tom and Michael are about activists like Larry Brinkin and Dan Savage, and don’t and can’t trust their versions of right and wrong.  They know same-sex marriage is only an issue because of the “benefits” and tax breaks (which, with their affluence, they could use, but since tax breaks for the wealthy is “1%” language to social justices, they can’t say it like that), and a chance to give a big  “fuck you” to organized religion.

The saddest aspect of this particular breed of “New Avengers” is how well politicians can use the arrogance and  commonly-found “White privilege” mindset of these people against themselves. President Obama’s “historic” announcement regarding same-sex marriage on May 9th, 2012. stated he supported SSM… but was leaving  it to the states to decide for themselves, in which, again, many already have. Incidentally(or maybe not), North Carolina voted against SSM the day before the interview. All LGBTetc. advocates heard was the “I support” part; they pledged Obama over nine million dollars in the three hours following the ABC News interview. Conservative groups, who definitely heard “let the state decide” part, increased their donations to Republican Mitt Romney. The battle for same-sex marriage has made preachers, politicians, and LGBTetc. activists tons of money in the last twenty years. NONE of them want it to end. Nobody kills the cow for hamburgers on the Fourth when you’ve got six months of milk in her.

I’d like to thank evryone for reading, and as a bonus clip, here’s a prime example of how insane this sh*t can get. Here is class warfare/conspiracy theorist expert Alex Jones, discussing the evil antisocial subliminal messages found in the “Batman” movie franchise. Now, the average social justice advocate laughs at this guy, but they look every bit as crazy when they talk about the Koch Party. And LGBTetc. crowd is just as silly when they blame coservatives for their shortcomings in their lives. Good God…